🔗 Share this article

During the previous race for the White House, the former president wooed the electorate with promises to lower prices immediately upon taking office. However, once his inauguration, there was precious little attention to affordability issues. This shifted after inflation-weary citizens expressed dissatisfaction at the ballot box. Shortly thereafter, the Trump administration launched a hastily assembled effort to address affordability. Unfortunately, this initiative is a disorganized endeavor—characterized by illogical claims, contradictions, magical thinking, blame-shifting, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Detached Claims and Supermarket Truth

Merely 48 hours post-election, Trump kicked off his affordability drive with a disastrous remark: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from the wealthy leader—often mingles with other ultra-rich individuals—revealed utter contempt for everyday citizens who struggle when visiting supermarkets. Essentially, he ignored their struggles as unimportant, suggesting they had it wrong about actual costs.

This statement that everything was “way down” was highly misleading and dishonest. How could all costs be falling when his cherished tariffs were pushing up costs? Recent data indicate the cost of bananas rose 6.9% in the last twelve months, beef prices climbed almost 15%, and coffee prices jumped by nearly 19%—in part due to punitive tariffs applied to Brazilian products. Between January and September, costs increased in the majority of main grocery groups monitored by the government’s price index, such as animal proteins (up 4.5%), drinks (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Falsehoods in Economic Claims

In spite of these numbers, Trump continues to push his big lie about lower costs. Since election day, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” declared “prices are way down,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” Such remarks contradict the reality that general costs have unarguably risen after the previous administration. Currently, price growth is at a 3% annual rate, which is 50% higher than the Federal Reserve’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, Trump claimed that fuel costs had fallen to nearly $2 a gallon, despite official data show they are over three dollars.

Faced with reality and declining opinion polls, advisers evidently cautioned that his “prices are down” message portrayed him as dangerously out of touch from typical Americans. A lot of voters are frustrated about rising costs after promises of decreases. As a result, aides proposed a simple solution: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. This sensible idea contradicted the president’s unrealistic claim that new tariffs wouldn’t raise prices for American shoppers.

Suggested Solutions and Their Potential Impact

As certain taxes reduced on several food items, Trump will likely claim that he has lowered costs once those foods begin to fall in price. This would be like an arsonist boasting for extinguishing a blaze that he ignited. On another occasion, when addressing McDonald’s executives, he stated that “this is the peak period of America” and assured listeners that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” These comments come naturally for a wealthy individual to make, but seem insincere to countless households who are struggling—especially when millions risk losing food stamps or rising insurance costs.

Per a survey conducted last fall, 74% of Americans think economic conditions are fair or poor, while just a quarter rate them good or excellent. A separate survey showed that 61% of Americans say Trump’s policies have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Economic Reality and Proposed Measures

Scott Bessent, the president’s chief financial officer, recently contradicted assertions of a prosperous era. He noted that far from booming, some parts of the US economy “are in recession.” Industrial production—which Trump vowed to save—appears to have contracted for multiple consecutive months and lost approximately tens of thousands of positions since January. Citing these challenges, Bessent urged the central bank to cut interest rates—an action that could help affordability.

In response to public dismay about affordability, Trump suggested a cash handout of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” not for “high income people.” For many households in need, it seems like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that Congress—concerned about large shortfalls—will enact such a plan. This idea could raise government expenditure, increase borrowing costs, and possibly drive prices higher by injecting cash into the economy.

Another proposed solution for affordability centered on creating half-century home loans, with the notion that they could lower housing costs. However, reality is that such lengthy loans have minimal impact to reduce installments—often reducing them by just $100 or $200 each month. The downside is that these mortgages could more than double the overall cost borrowers pay and hinder building home value.

Blaming the Previous Administration and Financial Outlook

As part of their affordability campaign, Trump and his team have again blamed Biden for economic problems, such as rising prices. Officials claimed they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up Biden’s inflation.” These are unfounded and inaccurate allegations. In reality, Biden handed over a robust economic situation, with inflation way down, solid expansion, and minimal joblessness. However, the current administration’s actions—especially his tariffs—have resulted in an difficult situation, driving costs higher and reducing economic output.

Per an economist, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are experiencing economic decline, with their economies damaged by the administration’s trade policies. Zandi fears that if key regions such as California and New York tumble into recession, the US could face a broad economic slump. In downturns, consumers generally possess less money to spend, and inflation often falls. Unfortunately, given the highly-touted cost initiative probably ineffective to control costs, his primary method for improving living standards might end up pushing the nation into recession—something that struggling Americans really can’t afford.